Case 2502917/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R MacAlister v Brewin Dolphin Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2502917/2019
- Decision date
- 10 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R MacAlister
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr R MacAlister's proceedings against Brewin Dolphin Limited were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It is a Rule 52 withdrawal judgment dated 10 June 2020, and it does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying claims.
No remedy was awarded and the judgment does not set out any liability findings, compensation calculation, or legal analysis beyond the dismissal following withdrawal. Employment Judge Johnson signed the judgment; no lay members are listed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Case listing identifies this category; the judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant and gives no merits findings. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | Case listing identifies this category; the judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant and gives no merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Case listing identifies this category; the judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant and gives no merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.