Case 2503153/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Treharne v Plant Services (Gateshead) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2503153/2018
- Decision date
- 3 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Members
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Treharne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G Treharne complained of unauthorised deductions from wages against Plant Services (Gateshead) Limited. At the hearing on 27 December 2018, the tribunal recorded that the claimant said his pay structure had changed during 2018, including salary and dividend elements, and that after his suspension on 3 September 2018 he had been paid less than he said was due. The respondent accepted that no written statement of particulars of employment had ever been provided, and the tribunal also noted that the respondent's documentary material had been served late.
The tribunal said it had insufficient evidence to reach a meaningful final judgment on the wider dispute because the respondent had failed to provide appropriate documentation and its witness statement was wholly inadequate. It was nevertheless satisfied that there had been an unauthorised deduction from wages in at least the amount of £2,482, calculated as the difference between £6,240 said to be due from suspension to dismissal and £3,758 actually paid.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,482 net to the claimant, with the respondent responsible for any income tax and national insurance contributions on that sum. It postponed the balance of the claimant's unauthorised deduction complaints to a later date, to be relisted only if the claimant notified the tribunal by 31 January 2019 that he wished to pursue them.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in the sum of at least £2,482 net. The remainder of the claimant's unauthorised deduction complaints was postponed for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | £2,482 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,482
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.