Case 2503248/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Robinson v R1 R Care Procurement Services R2 Paymax Ltd R3 Ezy Solutions Group — 2019
- Case reference
- 2503248/2018
- Decision date
- 24 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Robinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short procedural judgment under rule 52. The tribunal recorded that the claims against the second respondent, Paymax Ltd, and the third respondent, Ezy Solutions Group, were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment did not determine the substantive merits of the remaining dispute. It stated that the claimant's remaining claim(s) against the first respondent, R Care Procurement Services, would proceed to a public preliminary hearing on 22 July 2019.
No remedy was awarded in this judgment, and no substantive findings were made on liability for the remaining claim(s).
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claims against the second respondent, Paymax Ltd, were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claims against the third respondent, Ezy Solutions Group, were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.