Case 2503343/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Williamson First v Second Respondent: HM Prison Frankland Secretary of State for Justice — 2019
- Case reference
- 2503343/2018
- Decision date
- 9 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
- Panel members
- Mr S Hunter, Mr SJ Lie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Williamson First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis written record is procedural rather than a reasons judgment. At the hearing on 29 July 2019 before Employment Judge Aspden and lay members Mr S Hunter and Mr SJ Lie, the Tribunal recorded that the claim against the First Respondent was dismissed on withdrawal.
The record also states that the parties had agreed terms of settlement subject to Treasury approval and agreement of COT3 terms. By consent, the Tribunal ordered that the proceedings be stayed until 9 September 2019, and that unless either party applied to lift the stay before that date, the proceedings would be treated as dismissed without further order.
No substantive findings on the underlying allegations are set out in this written decision, and no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim against the First Respondent was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The parties had agreed terms of settlement subject to Treasury approval and agreement of COT3 terms. By consent, the Tribunal stayed the proceedings until 9 September 2019 and provided that, unless either party applied to lift the stay before then, the proceedings would be treated as dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.