Case 2503450/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P James v Capita Business Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2503450/2019
- Decision date
- 19 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Members
- Venue
- Newcastle Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr D Cattrell, Mrs B Kirby
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints of unfair dismissal, age discrimination and victimisation against Capita Business Services Limited. The case was heard at Newcastle Hearing Centre by CVP before Employment Judge Martin with members Mr D Cattrell and Mrs B Kirby.
During the hearing, the parties agreed to settle the proceedings and asked for time to put the settlement terms into effect. The tribunal dismissed the complaints upon withdrawal, subject to either party applying to relist the case within 28 days of the order.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal after the parties agreed to settle the proceedings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states the complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal after the parties agreed to settle the proceedings. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states the complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal after the parties agreed to settle the proceedings; no protected characteristic for the victimisation complaint is specified in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.