Case 2503455/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Ackers v EE Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2503455/2018
- Decision date
- 10 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Speker OBE
- Venue
- Newcastle Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr R Dobson, Mrs D Newey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Ackers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously found that the claimant's claims of indirect disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments were not established. Those disability discrimination claims were dismissed.
The claimant withdrew the age discrimination claim, and the tribunal dismissed that claim on withdrawal. The judgment did not record any monetary award or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments was not established and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | The age discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination was not established and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability was not established and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.