Case 2503477/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Thomas v Stagecarriage Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2503477/2019
- Decision date
- 17 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Johnson Date entered a Rule 21 judgment against Stagecarriage Ltd on 17 December 2019. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr H Thomas's wages, had dismissed him in breach of contract in respect of notice, and had failed to pay his holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £405 gross for the wages claim, £3,105 in damages for notice, and £345 gross for holiday pay.
The tribunal also found that Mr Thomas was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,657.50. The total monetary award reflected the four sums ordered in the judgment and came to £8,512.50 overall.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £405. | Upheld | — | £405 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £3,105. | Upheld | — | £3,105 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,657.50. | Upheld | — | £4,658 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £345. | Upheld | — | £345 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,513
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.