Case 2503494/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Douthwaite v International 365 Coaching Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2503494/2019
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Douthwaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Douthwaite was employed by International 365 Coaching Ltd from 14 May 2018 until 12 September 2019 as an executive assistant. The tribunal recorded that the respondent company had run into financial difficulties and struggled to pay wages. The claimant resigned because wages were not paid, and at termination she was owed 9 weeks' wages, 3.5 days of untaken holiday, and 4 weeks' notice pay was contractually due.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay; the tribunal recorded that the claimant was owed 9 weeks' wages at a gross weekly rate of £615.88. | Upheld | — | £5,538 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued and unpaid holiday pay; the tribunal found 3.5 days' untaken holiday, equating to £430.74 gross. | Upheld | — | £431 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim. The claimant had a 4-week contractual notice entitlement, and the award was reduced to reflect earnings in mitigation during the notice period. | Upheld | — | £900 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,868
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- mitigation of loss
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.