Case 2503522/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Robbie Nolan v Lakemere Global Holdings Ltd t/a AGO Outsourcing (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2503522/2019
- Decision date
- 12 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Robbie Nolan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not return a response, so the tribunal proceeded under rule 21 on the available material. It found that Robbie Nolan was employed at the respondent’s Newcastle premises, that the establishment employed more than 20 people, and that more than 20 employees were dismissed as redundant on or about 13 September 2019. The claimant received no prior notice of the business ceasing to operate, no consultation took place about the redundancies, and there was no appropriate representative at the workplace.
On that basis, the tribunal held that there had been a wholesale failure to inform and consult about the redundancies and that it was appropriate to make a protective award for the maximum period of 90 days. The judgment records that the protected period began on 13 September 2019 and that the section 189 claim succeeded.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant’s breach of contract claim for failure to give one week’s notice. It found that, at the time of dismissal, the claimant was entitled to one week’s notice, which it valued at £300, and it ordered the respondent to pay damages in that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for a protective award. The tribunal found a wholesale failure to inform and consult and set the protected period at 90 days from 13 September 2019, but the extracted text does not state a separate cash figure for the award. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Failure to give one week’s notice. The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to one week’s notice of employment, equating to £300, and ordered damages in that sum. | Upheld | — | £300 |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.