Case 2503616/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Mallett v Newcastle City Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 2503616/2019
- Decision date
- 7 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Mallett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's claim under rule 37. The judgment records that, by letter dated 5 February 2020, the tribunal gave Mr C Mallett an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued and because the respondent said he had not complied with tribunal orders or responded to the tribunal's letter of 30 January 2020.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Johnson held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment records no determination of the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the substantive claim type. The GOV.UK listing category was unfair dismissal, but the judgment text only refers to "the claim" being struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.