Case 2503641/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Shore v S Huby And Sons T/A Pioneer Transport Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2503641/2019
- Decision date
- 17 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Shore
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 05/02/2020, the Tribunal gave Mr B Shore an opportunity to make representations as to why his complaints of unfair dismissal and redundancy payment should not be struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, in response.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaints of unfair dismissal and redundancy payment under rule 37. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim(s) remained listed for hearing on 20/02/2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations by letter dated 05/02/2020 and he failed to make sufficient representations against strike out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | Struck out under rule 37 on the same basis as the unfair dismissal complaint: no reasonable prospect of success and no sufficient representations from the claimant in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 05/02/2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.