Case 2503673/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss BM Evans v Second to None Care Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2503673/2019
- Decision date
- 13 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss BM Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Miss BM Evans brought claims against Second To None Care Ltd. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service, and the Tribunal said it therefore had no jurisdiction to hear that claim.
The Tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,529.30. The listed hearing on 25 February 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service, so the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,529.30. | Upheld | — | £1,529 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,529
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.