Case 2503727/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Saunders v David Sturrock — 2020
- Case reference
- 2503727/2019
- Decision date
- 14 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Saunders
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Johnson sat alone at Teesside Justice Hearing Centre on 8 January 2020. The respondent did not attend and presented no response. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was represented in person.
The claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was found to be well-founded and succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay £264.00 in respect of unpaid wages.
The claimant's complaint of failure to pay accrued holiday pay was also found to be well-founded and succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,132.98 in respect of accrued holiday pay. The tribunal directed that both sums were to be paid gross, with the claimant responsible for any income tax and national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded and ordered payment of £264.00 in respect of unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £264 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the complaint of failure to pay accrued holiday pay well-founded and ordered payment of £1,132.98 in respect of accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,133 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,397
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.