Case 2503793/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Dawson v Mr Scott Meikle — 2020
- Case reference
- 2503793/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Dawson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response, and the tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claimant gave evidence that she worked for the respondent from 1 November 2018 to 6 September 2019 on gross pay of £25,000 per year, and the tribunal accepted payslip evidence showing what had been paid and what remained outstanding.
On the unlawful deductions claim, the tribunal found that wages were not paid for May, June, July, August, and the first week of September 2019. It accepted that the total gross amount properly payable at the end of the series of deductions was £8,836.07, equivalent to £7,456.39 net. The claimant had later received £6,000 in three instalments of £2,000, but because the respondent did not appear or explain whether those sums were gross or net, the tribunal treated them as gross payments in part satisfaction of the claim. That left £2,836.07 gross outstanding, which the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay.
The tribunal also upheld the breach of contract claim for unpaid expenses. The claimant produced a print-out showing outstanding expenses of £699.93, and the tribunal ordered that sum to be paid. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest or other heads of loss, and the overall monetary award was therefore £3,536.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a series of unpaid wage deductions for May to the first week of September 2019. It treated the later £6,000 paid after proceedings began as a gross payment in partial satisfaction because the respondent did not say whether it was gross or net. | Upheld | — | £2,836 |
| Breach of contract | The claim was for outstanding expenses, supported by a print-out showing £699.93 owed. | Upheld | — | £700 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,536
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.