Case 2503824/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Anderson v Digital Allies Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2503824/2019
- Decision date
- 23 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Dempsey Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle Upon Tyne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Anderson, brought claims against Digital Allies Limited for breach of contract under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 and for unlawful deductions from wages under the Employment Rights Act 1996. At a hearing in Newcastle Upon Tyne on 23 January 2020 before Employment Judge O’Dempsey, both claims were dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No remedy was awarded, and the judgment contains no split of compensation between the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim dismissed under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim dismissed under the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.