Case 2504150/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B MacKinnon v Josepth South-gate Smith — 2020
- Case reference
- 2504150/2019
- Decision date
- 28 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Members
- Venue
- Teesside Magistrates Court
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B MacKinnon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr B MacKinnon worked as a chef at the Farmers Arms. The tribunal found that his employment transferred to the respondent in September 2017 under TUPE, and that his contract later ended on 3 June 2019 when he took over the pub through a company he owned. The dispute before the tribunal concerned accrued holiday pay and a five per cent profit-share bonus.
On holiday pay, the tribunal preferred the claimant's evidence that the respondent had agreed that staff could carry holiday forward because of a planned refurbishment, and it found that the accrued holiday pay was due when the employment terminated. It rejected the claimant's case that payment was postponed until an exit statement was received. However, the claimant did not contact ACAS until 9 October 2019 and did not prove that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim earlier, so the holiday pay complaint was dismissed on time-limit and jurisdiction grounds.
On the bonus, the tribunal accepted that the parties had agreed a five per cent profit-share bonus and that it was to be calculated after receipt of the exit statement. It also accepted the respondent's evidence, including tax returns and accounts, showing that the Farmers Arms made net losses, so no further bonus was due. The unlawful deduction from wages claim relating to the bonus was therefore dismissed. The tribunal added that it did not consider that either the accrued holiday pay or the bonus transferred to the claimant when he took over the pub.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found the accrued holiday pay was due on termination, but dismissed the complaint because it was presented outside the three-month time limit and the claimant did not show that it was not reasonably practicable to bring it earlier; the judgment also treated the holiday pay as an alternative unlawful deduction from wages route. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted that a five per cent profit-share bonus had been agreed and that two £500 payments had been made in January 2019 as advance payments, but found the Farmers Arms made a net loss so no further bonus was due. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- regulation 13(9) WTR 1998
- regulation 30(2) WTR 1998
- s.13(3) ERA 1996
- s.23(2) ERA 1996
- s.23(4) ERA 1996
- regulation 4 TUPE 2006
- Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.