Case 2504226/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs W Johnson v Mr I Johnson (In Representative Capacity on behalf of The General Committee of Brandon Sports Club) and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2504226/2019
- Decision date
- 23 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
Parties
4 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. By letter dated 6 August 2020, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out. The judgment does not record any merits findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only a generic strike-out order and does not identify individual claim heads; this claim type is inferred from the tribunal listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only a generic strike-out order and does not identify individual claim heads; this claim type is inferred from the tribunal listing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.