Case 2504229/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Small v Diagonal Alternatives LLP — 2020
- Case reference
- 2504229/2019
- Decision date
- 28 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Small
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 July 2020 the Tribunal wrote to Miss T Small giving her an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why her claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that she failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The short judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim or claims, and it records no monetary remedy or substantive liability findings beyond the strike-out order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause or causes of action. It records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued, after the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.