Case 2504230/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Jobes v Rascals Playtime Childcare Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2504230/2019
- Decision date
- 7 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Jobes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Jobes was dismissed without notice when the nursery where she worked closed. The tribunal recorded that she had been on maternity leave at the time and had accrued 78 hours of untaken annual leave, with an hourly rate of £7.90.
The claim form, presented on 28 November 2019, included a number of complaints, but this judgment dealt with the Working Time Regulations complaint only. The proceedings were re-served on the respondent's registered office, no response was filed, and the tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the material before it, the tribunal was satisfied that the respondent had failed to pay the outstanding annual leave due on termination. It therefore found the complaint for accrued but untaken holiday pay well founded and succeeded in full.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £616.20, reflecting the 78 hours of outstanding leave at £7.90 per hour. No other remedy head was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal determined the accrued but untaken holiday pay complaint under Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £616.20, calculated from 78 hours at £7.90 per hour. The reasons also refer to a failure to pay outstanding annual leave on termination in breach of Regulation 14. | Upheld | — | £616 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £616
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.