Case 2504268/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James Dunham v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2504268/2019
- Decision date
- 6 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Garnon Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr James Dunham
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 February 2020, Employment Judge Garnon entered judgment under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 after the respondent filed no response. The judgment records that the respondent name was amended to Total Solutions Group (London) Limited, that service had been effected at the registered office, and that the material supplied in the claim form and later correspondence was sufficient to decide liability and remedy.
The tribunal found that the claims of unlawful deduction of wages and failure to pay compensation for untaken annual leave were well founded. The claimant's gross hourly rate was found to be £8.25, and the tribunal accepted that he had worked 57.5 hours for which he had not been paid. It therefore ordered repayment of £474.38 gross of tax for the wages claim.
On holiday pay, the tribunal applied regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and found that, of the claimant's 5.6 weeks' annual leave entitlement, he had taken 90 hours less leave than his proportionate entitlement up to the termination date. It awarded £742.50 gross of tax as compensation for untaken annual leave. The hearing listed for 14 February 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ordered repaid gross of tax for 57.5 unpaid hours at £8.25 per hour. | Upheld | — | £474 |
| Holiday pay | Compensation for untaken annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998; calculated on 90 hours less leave than proportionate entitlement, gross of tax. | Upheld | — | £743 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,217
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Part 2 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.