Mr K Beaumont v Asset55 Ltd — 2020

Case reference: 2504269/2019
Decision date: 29 July 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Sweeney

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr K Beaumont

Respondent

Asset55 Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive findings on liability are set out in the extracted judgment text.

The judgment is a withdrawal judgment only and records no remedy, award, or legal analysis beyond the dismissal of the proceedings. The claim types are taken from the case listing information supplied for this case context, but the judgment text itself does not distinguish between them.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the case listing provided in the case context.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment does not separately identify the claims in the body of the text; this claim type is taken from the case listing provided in the case context. The proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.