Case 2504272/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Christopher Reynolds v All Events Security Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2504272/2019
- Decision date
- 16 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Christopher Reynolds
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment for Mr Christopher Reynolds against All Events Security Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation). The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,953.98. The judgment describes that sum as a gross award and states that the claimant would be liable to HMRC for any tax and National Insurance due on it.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,364.48. No separate unfair dismissal finding is recorded in the judgment text. The listed hearing on 23 March 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,953.98. It also says this was a gross award and that the claimant would be liable to HMRC for any tax and National Insurance due. | Upheld | — | £1,954 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,364.48. | Upheld | — | £2,364 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,318
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.