Case 2504282/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M M Tunsi v Kelly Services UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2504282/2019
- Decision date
- 18 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S.Green Representation
- Venue
- North Shields
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M M Tunsi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt North Shields on 18 February 2020, Employment Judge A.M.S. Green recorded that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear Mr M M Tunsi's ordinary unfair dismissal claim against Kelly Services Limited. The judgment does not set out any merits findings on that claim.
The claimant's claims for race discrimination, discrimination based on religion and belief, and unlawful deduction from wages were dismissed on withdrawal. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal stated that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's ordinary unfair dismissal claim. | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.