Case 2504303/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr John Storey v Hetton le Hill Community Golf Club Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2504303/2019
- Decision date
- 22 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr John Storey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Arullendran dealt with the case on the papers and cancelled the hearing listed for 18 February 2020. The respondent, Hetton le Hill Community Golf Club Limited, did not appear to contest the claim, and the tribunal made findings on the claims before it.
The tribunal found the claimant’s breach of contract claim well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £4,212.00 gross. It also found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and therefore entitled to a redundancy payment of £249.75.
The tribunal further found the claimant’s holiday pay claim well-founded and ordered payment of £250.74 gross. The judgment states that the breach of contract and holiday pay awards were gross sums and that the claimant would be liable to tax and national insurance on them. The total amount ordered was £4,712.49.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered payment of a gross sum of £4,212.00. | Upheld | — | £4,212 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £249.75. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of a gross sum of £250.74. | Upheld | — | £251 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,712
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.