Case 2504304/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Thompson v Veolia — 2020
- Case reference
- 2504304/2019
- Decision date
- 8 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dealt with Miss K Thompson's complaint of pregnancy and maternity discrimination against Veolia UK Ltd under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had been ordered to pay a deposit of £200 following a preliminary hearing on 19 June 2020, and that the order was sent to her on 30 June 2020.
The claimant did not pay the deposit. Employment Judge Johnson therefore struck out the complaint of pregnancy and maternity discrimination under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment recorded that the remaining claims continued, so no outcome is extracted for those claims from this judgment. No remedy award was made; the £200 figure was a deposit order, not compensation or costs.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment struck out the complaint of pregnancy and maternity discrimination under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010 under rule 39(4) because the claimant did not pay a £200 deposit. The remaining claims continued and were not determined in this judgment. | Struck out | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 18 of the Equality Act 2010
- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.