Case 2504364/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Thompson v GVC Group — 2020
- Case reference
- 2504364/2019
- Decision date
- 9 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Speker OBE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 2 March 2020, the Tribunal gave Miss E Thompson an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 10 March 2020 did not take place.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the underlying complaint and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for not being actively pursued. This claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than separate merits reasoning in the strike-out judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for not being actively pursued. This claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than separate merits reasoning in the strike-out judgment. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.