Case 2504394/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Warrilow v Paignton Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2504394/2019
- Decision date
- 2 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Warrilow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Warrilow, brought a claim of unlawful deduction from wages after his employment with Paignton Limited ended on 9 September 2019. He said he was told he would be paid at the end of the month as usual, but no payment was received even though he did receive the relevant wage slip. The hearing took place on 13 March 2020 before Employment Judge Johnson sitting alone, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance or appearance for the respondent.
The respondent’s ET3 said it had retained the claimant’s final salary in part payment for stock losses for which it held him responsible. The tribunal referred to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and found there was no evidence of a written contract term authorising the deduction and no evidence that the claimant had signed anything agreeing to it. The claimant gave evidence on oath that he had never received a written contract and had never signed any agreement to deductions.
On that basis, the tribunal was satisfied that there had been an unauthorised deduction from wages and upheld the claim. It ordered Paignton Limited to repay £826.64 to the claimant as wages unlawfully deducted. The tribunal also amended the respondent’s name to Paignton Limited, based on a Companies House search, without the need for reservice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered repayment of wages unlawfully deducted in the sum of £826.64. | Upheld | — | £827 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £827
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.