Case 2600004/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Gedney v MKSS Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600004/2019
- Decision date
- 27 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Gedney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Gedney filed two duplicate breach of contract claims, one under case number 2600004/2019 and a second under 3310949/2019. The tribunal recorded that a response had been filed in time to the second claim on 27 March 2019.
The judgment states that, under claim 2600004/2019, judgment had been entered in error because no response appeared. That judgment in favour of the claimant was revoked as having been made in error. The decision does not determine the underlying merits of either breach of contract claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal recorded that this claim number had been entered in judgment in error because no response appeared, and that the judgment in the claimant's favour was revoked. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal noted this was a duplicate breach of contract claim and that a response had been filed on 27 March 2019 in time. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.