Case 2600009/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. L Thurgar v Solcare (Broxtowe & Erewash) Limited t/a Caremark (Broxtowe & Erewash) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600009/2020
- Decision date
- 9 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. L Thurgar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 52 judgment on withdrawal dated 8 April 2020, sent to the parties on 9 April 2020. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mrs L Thurgar, had brought complaints of unfair dismissal and unpaid holiday pay against Solcare (Broxtowe & Erewash) Limited t/a Caremark (Broxtowe & Erewash).
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal and unpaid holiday pay complaints following a withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive findings were made on the merits of those complaints, and no remedy was awarded in this judgment.
The judgment also records that the remaining complaint of discrimination relying on the protected characteristic of disability would proceed. That claim was not determined by this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed this complaint following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal dismissed this complaint following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.