Case 2600011/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs BA Morrell v Farmhouse Bakery — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600011/2020
- Decision date
- 10 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs BA Morrell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs BA Morrell against Farmhouse Bakery. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £800.13 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,412.27. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £61.58.
The listed hearing on 6 March 2020 was cancelled. The judgment does not record any further reasoning beyond the Rule 21 determination or any separate award components beyond the three sums ordered.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £800.13. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,412.27. | Upheld | — | £2,412 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £61.58. | Upheld | — | £62 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,274
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.