Case 2600014/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Peter John Earnshaw v Arnold Top Clean Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600014/2024
- Decision date
- 30 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Peter John Earnshaw
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing before Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone, the tribunal found that Mr Peter John Earnshaw had been unfairly dismissed by Arnold Top Clean Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation). It awarded a basic award of £4,376.40 and a compensatory award of £21,673.60, and recorded that the recoupment regulations do not apply.
The tribunal also found a breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered compensation of £2,628.08. In addition, it recorded that the respondent had failed to provide a statement of terms and conditions of employment and ordered £1,667.20 in respect of that failure. The written record further states that the respondent failed to supply payslips, but it does not record any separate monetary award for that point.
The total monetary awards recorded in the judgment come to £30,345.28. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £26,050 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,628 |
| Other | The tribunal recorded that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with a statement of terms and conditions of employment and ordered £1,667.20. | Upheld | — | £1,667 |
| Other | The written record states that the respondent failed to supply payslips, but no separate award or order is stated for this finding. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £30,345
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,376
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £21,674
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.