Case 2600018/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Clay v Department for Work and Pensions AT A FINAL HEARING — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600018/2020
- Decision date
- 1 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Clark
- Venue
- Lincoln
- Panel members
- Mr Austin, Mr Goldson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Clay
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs G Clay brought claims against the Department for Work and Pensions and the case was heard at Lincoln on 25, 27 and 28 July and 1 August 2022 before Employment Judge R Clark, with Mr Austin and Mr Goldson sitting as members. Mrs Clay appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr M Harris of Counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the claim of unfair dismissal. It also dismissed the claim described in the judgment as unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of the claimant’s disability. No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment describes this as a claim of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of the claimant’s disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.