Mr Z Arthur-Hawkes v Keir Coxhead — 2020

Case reference: 2600021/2020
Decision date: 29 August 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Swann JUDGMENT

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Z Arthur-Hawkes

Respondent

Keir Coxhead

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal dealt with the claim as a strike-out matter under rule 37. By a letter dated 29 August 2020, the Tribunal gave Mr Z Arthur-Hawkes an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it records only that "the claim" was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.