Case 2600021/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr SC Wilson v Strawson Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600021/2021
- Decision date
- 30 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr SC Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Strawson Limited unfairly dismissed Mr SC Wilson. This was a Rule 21 judgment, so the case was determined on the papers and the tribunal recorded the unfair dismissal finding in a short template judgment.
The judgment records that the claimant had 3 full years' service and was born on 7 July 1983. It also records his weekly gross earnings as £840.92 and net earnings as £635.64. On that basis, the tribunal calculated a basic award of £538 multiplied by 3, producing a basic award of £1,614.00.
The tribunal then awarded a compensatory award made up of £300 for loss of statutory rights, £1,614 for notice pay, and £5,764.29 for loss of earnings from dismissal to 30 November 2020. The hearing listed for 4 May 2021 was cancelled following the Rule 21 judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant and awarded a basic award plus compensatory award components. | Upheld | — | £9,292 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,292
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,614
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,678
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.