Case 2600031/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. N Murrell v Deichmann Shoes UK Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2600031/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. N Murrell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment is a short rule 52 dismissal. It records that the proceedings brought by Mr. N Murrell against Deichmann Shoes Uk Limited were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive findings are given on liability, and no remedy is awarded.
The text does not identify the underlying claim type(s) within the extracted extract, although the case listing on GOV.UK categorises the matter as unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. Because the judgment itself only records withdrawal and dismissal, the output treats the adjudicated outcome as a withdrawn claim dismissed under rule 52.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not identify the underlying legal claim(s) in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.