Case 2600031/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Hedworth v Cento Personnel Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600031/2020
- Decision date
- 16 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Hedworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Blackwell, sitting alone at Nottingham on 15 October 2020, dismissed the claimant's wrongful dismissal/breach of contract claim. The judgment records that the wrongful dismissal/breach of contract claim failed and was dismissed.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. On remedy, the tribunal stated that it was just and equitable under section 122(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to award a basic award of £210.00, and under section 123(6) of the same Act to award a compensatory award of £222.35.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total of £432.35.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this claim as 'wrongful dismissal/breach of contract' and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim succeeded and the tribunal awarded a basic award of £210.00 and a compensatory award of £222.35, making a total of £432.35. | Upheld | — | £432 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £432
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £210
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £222
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.122(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.123(6) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.