Case 2600033/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Holmshaw v Derbyshire Community Health Service NHS Foundation Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600033/2023
- Decision date
- 11 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Holmshaw
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Miss Holmshaw was unfairly dismissed by Derbyshire Community Health Service NHS Foundation Trust. The written record does not set out the tribunal’s detailed reasoning, because reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not requested within 14 days.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £11,197.90. That sum comprised a basic award of £4,282.50 and a compensatory award of £6,915.40, made up of £3,703.30 for loss of earnings from 28 November 2022 to 3 February 2023, £500 for loss of statutory rights, and £2,712.10 for pension loss. The tribunal also recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance & Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days; no further factual reasons are set out in the written record. | Upheld | — | £11,198 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,198
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,283
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,915
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.