Case 2600048/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Allen v Ultimate Electrical and Security Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600048/2023
- Decision date
- 17 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 5 January 2023. The respondent, Ultimate Electrical and Security Ltd, failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The listed hearing on 17 April 2023 was cancelled.
On the material before the tribunal, Mr D Allen succeeded on his wages claim. The judgment states that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £5,476 gross to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £5,476 gross. | Upheld | — | £5,476 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,476
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,476
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.