Case 2600074/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andrew Michael Horne v Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600074/2023
- Decision date
- 24 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Lincoln Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Andrew Michael Horne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remedy hearing on 4 October 2023, before Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone and with no appearance for the Respondent, the Tribunal determined that Mr Andrew Michael Horne was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,425.00 under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also found his complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay well founded and awarded £4,020.00 in damages.
The Tribunal further held that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed and awarded a compensatory award of £23,400.00. It recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 applied, with a total monetary award for unfair dismissal of £23,400.00, a prescribed element of £13,668.00, a prescribed period running from 27 January 2023 to 4 October 2023, and a balance of £9,732.00.
In addition, the Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages of £2,550.00 gross and holiday pay of £340.00. It also found that, when the proceedings were begun, the Respondent was in breach of its duty to provide written employment particulars, and awarded £1,800.00 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, stating that there were no exceptional circumstances making an award equivalent to 2 weeks' gross pay unjust or inequitable and that 4 weeks' gross pay was just and equitable. The total compensation payable was recorded as £39,535.00.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The Tribunal determined under section 163 ERA 1996 that the Claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,425.00. | Upheld | — | £7,425 |
| Breach of contract | The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well founded, and damages of £4,020.00 were awarded. | Upheld | — | £4,020 |
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found the dismissal unfair and awarded a compensatory award of £23,400.00. It recorded that the total monetary award for unfair dismissal was £23,400.00, with a prescribed element of £13,668.00 for the period 27 January 2023 to 4 October 2023 and a balance of £9,732.00. | Upheld | — | £23,400 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well founded, and £2,550.00 gross was awarded. | Upheld | — | £2,550 |
| Holiday pay | The complaint in respect of holiday pay was well founded, and £340.00 was awarded. | Upheld | — | £340 |
| Other | The Tribunal found that when proceedings were begun the Respondent was in breach of its duty to provide written employment particulars. It awarded £1,800.00 under section 38 Employment Act 2002, equal to 4 weeks' gross pay. | Upheld |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £39,535
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £23,400
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.163 ERA 1996
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.