Case 2600075/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Cresswell v FCC Environment UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600075/2021
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- East Midlands Region vis Cloud Video Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Cresswell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr K Cresswell's claim of unfair dismissal succeeded against FCC Environment (UK) Limited. The judgment was given by Employment Judge Brewer on 24 June 2021 at the East Midlands Region hearing conducted via Cloud Video Platform.
The only remedy point recorded in the extracted judgment is that the claimant's basic and compensatory award were to be reduced by 50% under sections 122(2) and 123(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The extracted text does not state the underlying monetary amounts or a total award, so no figure can be recorded from this judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded. It further ordered that the claimant's basic and compensatory award be reduced by 50% pursuant to sections 122(2) and 123(6) Employment Rights Act 1996, but no monetary figure was stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.122(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.123(6) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.