Case 2600076/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Wayne David Fletcher v Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd Record of a Remedy Hearing at the Employment Tribunal — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600076/2023
- Decision date
- 24 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Lincoln Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Wayne David Fletcher
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hutchinson, sitting alone at Lincoln on 4 October 2023, conducted a remedy hearing in the claim brought by Mr Wayne David Fletcher against Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd. The Claimant appeared in person; the Respondent did not appear. The judge determined the Claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, and found the complaints of breach of contract (notice pay), unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, and holiday pay to be well founded.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a compensatory award of £5,967.43 and recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 apply, with a prescribed element of £4,273.97 covering 10 February 2023 to 4 October 2023. The tribunal also found that, when proceedings were begun, the Respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars, and that there were no exceptional circumstances making an award unjust or inequitable; it made an award equal to four weeks' gross pay (£2,284.00) under section 38 Employment Act 2002.
The total compensation payable by the Respondent to the Claimant was £31,325.81. The judgment is a record of the remedy hearing only; reasons were given orally and written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Awarded under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £11,135 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract in relation to notice pay. | Upheld | — | £6,663 |
| Unfair dismissal | Compensatory award; Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 apply. Prescribed element £4,273.97 (10 February 2023 to 4 October 2023); difference £1,693.46. | Upheld | — | £5,967 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Payable gross. | Upheld | — | £4,091 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,186 |
| Other | Award under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for breach of duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars; tribunal found it just and equitable to award 4 weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £2,284 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £31,326
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,967
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.