Case 2600079/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Swan v Holbeach & Fleet Veterinary Clinic — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600079/2020
- Decision date
- 24 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Swan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Miss E Swan’s complaint of unfair dismissal. The reason given was that the Claimant had been employed by Holbeach & Fleet Veterinary Clinic for less than two years, and the Tribunal had previously written to her on 24 March 2020 giving her an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The Tribunal recorded that the Claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out. The judgment states that the Claimant’s remaining claims stayed listed for hearing on 24/07/20.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity by letter dated 24 March 2020 to make representations or request a hearing on whether the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out because she had been employed for less than two years. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.