Miss L Waterfield v Adindi-Assist Limited — 2022

The claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Ahmed Date decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined in the respondent's absence. The hearing listed for 13 May 2022 was cancelled.

The tribunal found that Miss L Waterfield had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,945.76 gross. It also found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,788.00.

The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £679.49 gross. Applications for pension contributions, loss of statutory rights and loss of fringe benefits (broadband) were refused because those heads were described as applicable to an unfair dismissal claim and no unfair dismissal complaint had been brought.