Case 2600088/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Judd v Magnet Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600088/2023
- Decision date
- 28 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Judd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing on 28 April 2023, before Employment Judge Shore sitting remotely from Nottingham, the claimant, Mr P Judd, brought claims against Magnet Limited for unauthorised deduction from wages, failure to pay holiday pay, and breach of contract in relation to notice pay. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms L Griffin, People and Culture Partner.
The tribunal recorded that all three claims failed. It held that the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages was dismissed, the claim for failure to pay holiday pay was dismissed, and the breach of contract claim for failure to pay notice pay was dismissed.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would follow unless requested. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.