Case 2600089/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Hunt v East Midlands Homes Co-operative Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600089/2024
- Decision date
- 6 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Singh Representation
- Venue
- Midlands East
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Hunt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs H Hunt’s claims were heard at the Midlands East Employment Tribunal via CVP on 31 May 2024 before Employment Judge Singh. The respondent was East Midlands Homes Co-operative, represented by Ms A. Acheampong, and the claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded and awarded £3,302.48 gross. It also held that the claim for unpaid holidays succeeded and awarded £294 gross.
The claimant’s breach of contract claim also succeeded, with an award of £160.73. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction from wages was successful; award stated as £3,302.48 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,302 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holidays was successful; award stated as £294 gross. | Upheld | — | £294 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract was successful; award stated as £160.73. | Upheld | — | £161 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,757
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.