Case 2600097/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A. Urbonas v Fruehauf Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600097/2024
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rachel Broughton
- Venue
- Midlands East
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A. Urbonas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting as Employment Judge Rachel Broughton alone at Midlands East, heard the claims on 11, 12 and 30 September 2024. The claim of wrongful dismissal was found not well founded and was dismissed. The claim of unfair dismissal under sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was found well founded and succeeded.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a basic award of £9,582.30 and a compensatory award of £1,698.70. The basic award of £10,647 was reduced by 10% for contributory fault. The compensatory award was built from five weeks' loss of earnings at £453 net per week, a further four weeks at the £52 net weekly differential against the claimant's new employment (based on an average of four payslips showing £401 net per week), and nine weeks of employer pension contributions averaging £19 per week, together with £500 for loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal then applied a 50% Polkey reduction to the compensatory element (including loss of statutory rights), followed by a 20% ACAS uplift, and a further 10% reduction for contributory fault. The recoupment provisions were stated not to apply. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the wrongful dismissal claim not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim under sections 94 and 98 ERA 1996 succeeded. Compensatory award reduced by a 50% Polkey reduction, increased by a 20% ACAS uplift, and reduced by 10% for contributory fault. | Upheld | — | £1,699 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,281
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £9,582
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,699
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 94 ERA 1996
- section 98 ERA 1996
- Polkey
- ACAS uplift
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.