Case 2600100/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Standen Engineering Limited v Aaron Rashad — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600100/2019
- Decision date
- 12 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Standen Engineering Limited
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 52 judgment dated 12 April 2019 before Employment Judge Swann. The judgment records the parties as Standen Engineering Limited and Aaron Rashad, and it does not set out any substantive factual findings on the underlying dispute.
The only disposal recorded is that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No remedy, liability finding, or costs order is stated in the extracted text.
The source listing categorises the case under Working Time Regulations, but the judgment text itself does not describe the particular working time issue in dispute. On the material provided, the tribunal's order was procedural only and did not determine the merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify the substantive allegation; the GOV.UK listing places the case under Working Time Regulations. The order records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.