Case 2600100/2025 · Employment Tribunal
James Pelham Rothwell Barker v Mercia Recruitment Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600100/2025
- Decision date
- 15 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
James Pelham Rothwell Barker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claimant’s claim for redundancy pay under case number 2600100/2025. In a Rule 22 judgment, Employment Judge Broughton recorded that the claim was presented in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal on 4 February 2025 and that a determination could properly be made of the redundancy pay claim.
The tribunal found that the claimant, James Pelham Rothwell Barker, was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, the tribunal held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,300. No other claim outcome, legal test, or separate remedy calculation is stated in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,300. | Upheld | — | £6,300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.