Case 2600107/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D T Stevenson v Mid - Air Site Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600107/2024
- Decision date
- 9 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D T Stevenson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 12 January 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages (£1,935.00 gross), had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice (£522.50 damages), had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement (£365.75), and had failed to provide a statement of terms and conditions of employment as required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (£2,088.00).
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £4,911.25 in total. Employment Judge Hutchinson signed the judgment on 9 May 2024.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; awarded £1,935.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,935 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £522.50. | Upheld | — | £523 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay claimant's holiday entitlement; awarded £365.75. Classified as holiday_pay; the gov.uk listing referenced Working Time Regulations, but the judgment addresses holiday entitlement only. | Upheld | — | £366 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996; £2,088.00 awarded. No dedicated enum value for written statement claims, so classified as 'other'. | Upheld | — | £2,088 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,911
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.