Case 2600118/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Bircham and Others v Aspire Achieve Advance Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600118/2019
- Decision date
- 9 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms N Bircham and Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made by consent after the Schedule 1 Claimants, the First Respondent and the Second Respondent agreed terms. The Tribunal ordered a protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 in respect of the Schedule 1 Claimants.
The First Respondent was ordered to pay remuneration to the Schedule 1 Claimants for a protected period of 50 days from 11 October 2018, identified as the date on which the first of the dismissals to which the complaint related took effect. The judgment stated that payments made by the First Respondent, rather than the Secretary of State, would be paid as an unsecured dividend subject to the normal categories of preferential debts under Schedule 6 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
There was no order as to costs or interest, and the parties were given leave to enforce the order without a further order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Judgment by consent made a protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for the Schedule 1 Claimants, including case number 2600118/2019. The award was for a protected period of 50 days from 11 October 2018, but no monetary sum was specified. | Settled | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Schedule 6 of the Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.